The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on three consecutive dates despite repeated summons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 1137 of 2008
…
Sadhna Devi … … Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Ors … Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK.
… For the Petitioner : - None. For the Respondents : - Mr. Sarvendra Kumar, J.C. to S.C. (L&C)
…
09/01.08.2017 When the matter is called out, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Sarvendra Kumar, learned J.C. to S.C. (L&C) appearing for the Respondent-State is present.
On 10.07.2017 and 24.07.2017 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.
It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to pursue the writ application.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
APK
(Pramath Patnaik, J.)
Sadhna Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Pramath Patnaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
