Neyaz Ansari v. Ashmina Khatoon and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No.713…
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No.713…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No.713 of 2015
Neyaz Ansari …..Petitioner Versus 1. Ashmina Khatoon. 2. Muskan Babli. 3. Masoom Babli ….Opposite Parties ----Coram: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----For the Petitioner : Mr. I. Ahmad, Advocate For the State : APP ---04/04.12.2017: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
this application.
Permission is accorded.
Let this application be dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay,J)
Ravi/
Neyaz Ansari
Ashmina Khatoon
Muskan Babli
Masoom Babli
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court