Kali Charan Agarwal v. State of Jharkhand And Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the cr.M.P. instant application dismissed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the case permitted; application dismissed.
Petitioner withdrew the cr.M.P. instant application dismissed accordingly.
Withdrawal of the case permitted; application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.81 of 2010
Kali Charan Agarwal .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Girija Shankar Verma .... .... .... Opp. Parties -----CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahtha, Advocate
11/24.11.2017
Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate appearing on behalf of the
petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this case.
In view of above submission, instant application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(B.B. Mangalmurti, J . )
R.S./Minj
Kali Charan Agarwal
The State of Jharkhand
Girija Shankar Verma
B B Mangalmurti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court