The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition. It noted that on the preceding status report, four witnesses were examined in the corresponding case, and therefore no further action was required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.1372 of 2011
1.Surya Kumar Singh 2.Dipendra Nath Mallick 3.Shyam Sundar Prasad Singh 4.Sarwajit Shukla 5.Subhash Chandra Shukla 6.Dinesh Kumar Singh 7.Ramniranjan Raj Saria @ R.N. Ransaria … … Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Akhilesh Singh Yadav … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI --For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
08/24.11.2017 Counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. are present.
On perusal of the status report submitted by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur through letter no.333 dated 29th July, 2016 it appears that by that time four witnesses were examined in Golmuri P.S. Case No.86 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No.830 of 2010.
Therefore in this circumstances, instant criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of.
(B.B. Mangalmurti, J.)
R.P./
Surya Kumar Singh and others
The State of Jharkhand and others
B.B. Mangalmurti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
