Two interlocutory orders granting relief: condoning a four-day delay in an application and restoring a dismissed criminal revision to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M. P. No. 1718 of 2017
Gopal Ghosh … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Suraj Verma, A.P.P.
5/06.10.2017 I. A. No. 7786 of 2017:
Heard Mr. Sanjay Prasasd, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suraj Verma, learned A.P.P. for the State.
This interlocutory application has been preferred by the petitioner for condoning the delay of 4 days in filing this application.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 4 days in filing this application is hereby condoned.
I. A. No. 7786 stands disposed of.
Cr.M.P. No. 1718 of 2017:
This application has been preferred for restoration of Criminal Revision No. 1030 of 2015 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of order dated 11.05.2017.
Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the Cr. Revision No. 1030 of 2015 is restored to its original file.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
Gopal Ghosh
The State of Jharkhand
RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
