The petitioner sought restoration of a writ petition dismissed for default, claiming unavoidable circumstances prevented counsel from appearing. The Court found no sufficient cause for the delay, noting no representation had been filed on successive dates, and dismissed the petition.
Petition for restoration of W.P.C. No. 391 of 2015 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 56 of 2017
Santosh Kumar Tibrewal ….... Petitioner
Vrs.
1.Debu Gon 2.Ganesh Kumar Gon 3.Ajit Kumar Gon 4.Susant Gon
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Rakesh For the Opposite Parties :
05/19.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A.Mohanty
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to restoration of a writ petition dismissed for default.
If the plea of unavoidable circumstances is sufficient to apply the discretion in favour of the defaulting petitioner.
Santosh Kumar Tibrewal
Debu Gon
Ganesh Kumar Gon
Ajit Kumar Gon
Susant Gon
Prasant Gon
Apareesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
