Allowed

Subhojeet Mitra v. The State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Jul 2017A.B.A./4269/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Subhojeet Mitra, who feared arrest in a case involving cheating and forgery. The court directed his release upon arrest or surrender within four weeks upon depositing security and furnishing bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail; release on depositing Rs. 10,000 cash security and furnishing a Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of like amount.

Subhojeet Mitra Vs The State Of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 4269 of 2017

¶3

Subhojeet Mitra … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party

¶4

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶6

02 /19.07.2017 Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No. 473 of 2015 (G.R. No. 1221 of 2015) registered under sections 420, 465, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. P.P. for the State.

¶8

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that during investigation of Margomunda P.S. Case No. 119 of 2015 the informant who is the Officer-in-Charge of the Margomunda Police Station obtained CDR of some of the SIM numbers which revealed that the coaccused Sonu Vishwakarma is selling sim cards on forged papers. The allegation against the petitioner is that he is an associate of Sonu Vishwakarma and he supplied sim cards obtained on forged documents. The F.I.R was registered in the year 2015 but till now the process under section 82 and 83 of Cr.P.C. has not been issued against the petitioners. The allegations are all false. The petitioner is a student and he is no way involved in any illegal activities. Hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶9

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶10

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the petitioner – Subhojeet Mitra be admitted to anticipatory bail.

¶11

Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar, in connection with Madhupur P.S. Case No. 473 of 2015 (G.R. No. 1221 of 2015), subject to the condition that he will cooperate with the investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer, as and when noticed by him and other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶12

Sonu-

Subhojeet Mitra v. The State Of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhojeet Mitra v. The State Of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeshwar Upadhyay Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Madhup Kumar And Anr. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Jafar Raja Alias Jafirul Haque Alias Jafirul Haq Alias Jafar And Anr. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Md Arif And Ors. Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Vivek Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Jharkhand

Ranjit Kumar Sinha Vs The State Of Jharkhand