Arbind Mahto And Ors. v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court refused the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR alleging attempt to murder, looting of Rs.6 lakhs, and arson. The court rejected the prayer due to the serious nature of the direct allegations.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3291 of 2017
- Arbind Mahto @ Arvind Mahto
- Hri Mahto
- Mahadev Pahan
- Basu Pahan
- Sanjay Mahto
- Kameshwaqr Mahto
- Bali Pahan
- Rajendra Mahto
- Umesh Mahto
- Rajesh Mahto
- Sharma Mahto @ Karma Mahto
- Jabbulal Mahto @ Jhabu Mahto
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners faced with serious criminal charges allegedly involving murder attempt, loot, and arson?
Whether the direct allegations of attempting to murder and the serious gravity of the offences warrant refusal of anticipatory bail?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arbind Mahto @ Arvind Mahto and others
Coram
Anil Kumar Choudhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./3291/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court