Writ petition filed against the State and Saradha Reality Ltd. dismissed for nonprosecution as petitioner's counsel did not appear on the date of hearing after previous adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 4669 of 2014
..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : J.C to A.G.
04/16.08.2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondent- State is present. On the previous date also nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was adjourned by way of an indulgence.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
A. Mohanty
Jai Prakash Choudhary and others
The State of Jharkhand through the Deputy Commissioner, Pakur
The State of West Bengal through the Chief Secretary, Kolkata
Hon'ble Chairman, Justice Shyamal Kumar Sen Commission, Kolkata
Sardha Reality India Ltd.
Apareesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
