The petitioner filed a PIL regarding election matters. Since the election had already been held by that date, the petition was rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly. No substantive legal proposition was laid down in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (PIL) No. 1687 of 2015
Manoj Kumar son of Ram Prasad Yadav resident of Bandh Dhar, Dhaiya, PO I.S.M PS and District Dhanbad Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand Project Building Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, District Ranchi
2.The Chief Election Commissioner, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, PO & PS Kanke, District Ranchi
3.The District Election Officer-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad at PO & District Dhanbad
4.The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhanbad, PO, PS & District Dhanbad
Respondents
---
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Shree Chandrashekhar
For the Petitioners/Appellant : Mr.P.Gangopadhaya, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr.A.Banerjee, GA
Dated : 5th August, 2016 Per Virender Singh, C.J. :
Since election has already been held, learned counsel for the
petitioner says that the instant petition renders infructuous.
Disposed of accordingly.
(Shree Chandrashekhar,J.)
dey
Manoj Kumar
The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary Government of Jharkhand
The Chief Election Commissioner
The District Election Officer-cum-Deputy Commissioner
The Sub-Divisional Officer
Virender Singh
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
