Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a criminal revision application. The Single Judge permitted the withdrawal with liberty to raise the same points at an appropriate stage and dismissed the application.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to raise points at appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 534 of 2015 1. Md. Khursid Alam 2. Zahir Khan .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Roshan Parveen … Opposite Parties --CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --For the Petitioners : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Azeemuddin, Advocate
Order No. 12 Dated 19th July 2016
After some argument, Mr. Mohit Prakash, learned counsel , appearing for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to raise all the points at the appropriate stage.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
MK
Md. Khursid Alam
Zahir Khan
The State of Jharkhand
Roshan Parveen
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
