Disposed
Mahendra Mahato v. the State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Jharkhand HCCr.Rev./100/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 100 of 2015
Mahendra Mahato, S/o Late Mathur Mahato, R/o VillageBowa, P.O-Bowa Kala, Via Bansjora, P.S.-Tetulmari, Dist.Dhanbad …… Petitioner Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Kunjia Devi, W/o Mahendra Mahato, R/o VillageBagdaha, P.O-Bagdaha, P.S.-Rajganj (Katras), Dist.Dhanbad …… Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---------
03/Dated: 06th November, 2015
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P are in attendance.
2. It transpires from the office note that as per service report the notice could not be served upon O.P. No.02, as she could not be found at the address given in notice. 3. Under the circumstance, learned counsel for the petitioner shall take fresh steps for issuance of notice upon O.P No.02, at her present and correct address, under registered cover with A/D as well as under ordinary, for which a week's time after Diwali vacation is allowed.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
Chandan/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether issue of fresh notice to OP No.02 at correct address can be allowed with extension till after vacation.
Mahendra Mahato
The State of Jharkhand
Kunjia Devi
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court