In this one-line order, the High Court of Jharkhand disposed of a contempt petition upon admission that the respondent had complied with the order and paid the due amount; no substantive issues were decided.
Contempt petition disposed of after admission of compliance and payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 461 of 2016
Emelda Minz
... ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sri Sachchidanand D. Tigga, District Superintendent of Education, Gumla ... ... ... Opp. Parties
... ... ... Opp. Parties
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
............
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mrs. Neelam Tirkey, J.C. to Sr. S.C. I
2/05.08.2016
Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the contention of the opposite parties that the order under offence has been complied with and the admissible leave encashment amount has been paid to the petitioner.
Show cause has already been filed.
Accordingly, contempt petition is disposed of.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
Binit
Emelda Minz
State of Jharkhand
Sri Sachchidanand D. Tigga
Apareesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
