This is a short order disposing of a contempt petition. The court accepted that the underlying order was complied with and leave encashment was paid, leading to disposal.
Contempt petition disposed of with no further direction as compliance was admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 456 of 2016
1.Dorothia Kujur
2.Meristela Kindo
... ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sri Sachchidanand D. Tigga, District Superintendent of Education, Gumla ... ... ... Opp. Parties
... ... ... Opp. Parties
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH
............
For the Petitioners : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mrs. Neelam Tirkey, J.C. to Sr. S.C. I
3/05.08.2016
Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the contention of the opposite parties that the order under offence has been complied with and the admissible leave encashment amount has been paid to the petitioners.
Show cause has already been filed.
Accordingly, contempt petition is disposed of.
(Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.)
Binit
Dorothia Kujur
Meristela Kindo
The State of Jharkhand
Sri Sachchidanand D. Tigga
Apareesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
