In the High Court of Jharkhand, Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay allowed the withdrawal of W.P.(S) No. 297 of 2012 filed by Raj Kumar Mahto against central government entities and family members, dismissing the petition accordingly.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The incidental application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 297 of 2012
Raj Kumar Mahto son of late Ramdhan Mahto resident of Village Kedla Basti, PO Kedla, PS Mandu, District Ramgarh … … Petitioner Versus
1.The Central Coalfield Ltd. through its Managing Director, Darbhanga House, PO & PS Ranchi, District Ranchi – 1 2.The Project Officer, Parej, O.C.P., Barkakhana, PO Banji, PS Barkakhana, Dist. Ramgarh 3.The Regional Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund, Main Road, Ranchi PO & PS Ranchi, Dist. Ranchi – 1
4.Rajendra Mahto S/o late Ramdhan Mahto 5.Ritu Kumari D/o late Ramdhan Mahto both R/o village- Kedla Basti, PO Kedla, PS Mandu, Dist. Ramgarh … … Respondents ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pradip Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kaustav Panda, Advocate
10/01.05.2015 I. A. No. 2400 of 2015:
This application has been filed for withdrawal of W.P.(S) No. 297 of 2012.
Considering the averments made in the instant application, the
petitioner is permitted to withdraw this application.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
I. A. No. 2400 of 2015 stands disposed of.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 2
Raj Kumar Mahto
The Central Coalfield Ltd.
1. The Project Officer, Parej
2. The Regional Commissioner, Coal Mines Provident Fund
3. Rajendra Mahto
4. Ritu Kumari
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
