In a civil revision filed with a delay of 62 days against a judgment in Title Eviction Suit No.09 of 2011, the court condoned the delay upon satisfaction and admitted the matter for hearing, with no notice issued as the sole respondent appeared.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No.05 of 2013
Sanjay Biswas …… Petitioner Versus Lilawati Devi …… Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Dwarika Prasad, Advocate
Nobody appears on behalf of respondents.
On being satisfied with the grounds taken in the application, the delay of 62 days in presenting the appeal is condoned.
I.A. No.1380 of 2013 stands allowed.
The sole respondent has appeared, therefore, there is no need to issue
notice.
List this case under the heading 'for admission.'
(D. N. Upadhyay, J.)
NKC
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 62 days in preferring the civil revision should be condoned.
Whether the civil revision against the judgment in Title Eviction Suit No.09 of 2011 can be admitted.
Sanjay Biswas
Lilawati Devi
D.N. Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
