Urmila Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the petitioners' prayer for anticipatory bail in a case involving murder by burning following a dowry dispute, citing serious direct allegations in a dying declaration.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A. B. A. No.1895 of 2015
- Urmila Devi.
- Vikash Tiwary @ Vikas Tiwary. ………. Petitioners. -VersusThe State of Jharkhand. .……... Opposite Party.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY
For the Petitioners : Mr. K. K. Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For Informant : Miss Jyoti Nayan, Advocate
03/18.08.2015: Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 498A, 326, 307, 34 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
It reveals from the Fardbeyan of the deceased that she was subjected to tortured and treated with cruelty for want of more dowry during her lifetime. On the date of incident, Petitioner No.2 sprinkled kerosene oil, whereas Petitioner No.1 set her on fire. She sustained burn injury and removed to hospital, where her Fardbeyan was recorded, and on the basis of which present case has been instituted. During treatment, she scummed to her injury.
It is submitted that the informant had made attempt to commit suicide and later she died. Her husband had tried to save her and during that he also sustained burn injury and was admitted to a hospital for his treatment. The informant had also given statement before the police that she had committed suicide, which is appearing from the case diary.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be permitted to the petitioners accused of murdingar set on fire.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Urmila Devi
- petitioner
Vikash Tiwary
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./1895/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court