The court granted an adjournment to the respondent for filing a counter affidavit and stayed the execution of the warrant of arrest against the petitioner until the next hearing.
Stayed the execution of the warrant of arrest against the petitioner; listed the matter on 8.1.2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi
Cr.M.P.No.668 of 2012
Sandeep Kumar Mahto @ Sandip Mahto….Petitioner
V E R S U S
State of Jharkhand and another…Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD
For the Petitioner: Mr.K.P.Deo For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Ananda Sen
06/ 18.12.13. Mr.Ananda Sen, learned counsel appearing for the opposite
party no.2 submits that the matter be posted for other day so that in
the meantime, he may file counter affidavit.
As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 8.1.2014.
Till then, warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner of
Complaint Case No.124 of 2011, pending in the court of Sub-divisional
Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga, shall not be executed.
Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court
concerned through FAX at the cost of the petitioner.
(R.R.Prasad, J.)
ND/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to stay the execution of a warrant of arrest on an adjournment application.
Sandeep Kumar Mahto @ Sandip Mahto
State of Jharkhand
Another
R.R. Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
