In a bail application, the Court examined the victim's statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., finding the petitioner guilty of kidnapping and sexual relations, leading to the rejection of the bail plea.
Bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
B.A. No. 5572 of 2014
Rohit Ravidas ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opp. Party
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR
............
For the Petitioner : Mr. Peeyush Krishna Choudhary For the Opp. Party : Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.
2/11.09.2014
Bail application filed by petitioner Rohit Ravidas in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No. 37 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 322 of 2013, pending in the court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Godda is moved by Sri Peeyush Krishna Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Vinay Kumar Tiwary, learned Additional PP for the State.
From perusal of statement of victim recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C. I find that petitioner has kidnapped the girl and established sexual relation with her.
Under the said circumstance, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner above named on bail. Accordingly, his bail application rejected.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Binit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the petitioner, accused of kidnapping and sexual relation with a minor, should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit Ravidas
The State of Jharkhand
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
