Petitioners sought permission to withdraw an application before the Jharkhand High Court; the matter was heard on an urgency slip.
Permission to withdraw the application granted; the application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 2483 of 2014
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate
Mr. Naresh Prasad Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vikash Kishore, A.P.P.
02/01.08.2014 An urgency slip was filed by the counsel for the applicants and therefore, the matter has been heard today.
The learned counsel appearing for the applicants
seeks permission to withdraw the application.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Let a copy of this order be sent through FAX to the concerned trial court.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Amit/
Phulchand Mahto
Sahadari Devi
Binod Mahato @ Binod Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
