The court condoned the delay in filing the review application and then dismissed the review application since no case for review was made out.
Review application dismissed; delay in filing condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 134 of 2009
Radha Kant Choudhary ... Petitioner Versus Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi & Anr. ... Respondents ------CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY
-----For the Petitioner : M/s. Indrajit Singh & Suchitra Pandey, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Advocate
Order No. 06 Dated 1st July, 2013
I.A. No. 3432 of 2009
Heard learned counsel for the parties on application for condonation of delay being I.A. No. 3432 of 2009.
In view of the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing this review application is condoned.
I.A. No. 3432 of 2009 is allowed.
Civil Review No. 134 of 2009
Heard on merits of the review application.
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that no case is made out for review of the impugned judgment dated 02.09.2009. Hence, the review application is dismissed.
(Prakash Tatia, C.J.)
(Jaya Roy, J.)
Birendra/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing a review application should be granted.
Whether any case is made out for review of the impugned judgment dated 02.09.2009.
Radha Kant Choudhary
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi & Anr.
Prakash Tatia
Jaya Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
