In an original bail application concerning a case pending before the District Judge, Garhwa, the Court rejected the prayer for bail. The Judge declined to reconsider the earlier rejection of bail due to the allegations made in the first information report.
The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI
B. A. No. 212 of 2013
Alizan Sheikh ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opp. Party
CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR
............
For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.S.Pd. A.P.P.
2/01.02.2013
Bail application filed by petitioner Alizan Sheikh in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 47 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 236 of 2011, S.T. No. 297 of 2012 pending in the court of learned District Judge-Ist, Garhwa is moved by Sri R.S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri S.S. Prasad, learned Additional PP. for the State.
Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected in view of the allegations made in the first information report. At this stage, I am not inclined to reconsider bail prayer of petitioner.
Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner above named rejected.
(Prashant Kumar, J.)
Binit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in the pending criminal proceedings?
Alizan Sheikh
The State of Jharkhand
Prashant Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
