The High Court disposed of the writ petition without adjudicating merits, accepting the petitioner's submission that an efficacious alternative remedy exists under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
Writ petition disposed without entering into the merits due to availability of alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P. (C) No. 3935 of 2012
M/s Varun Steel Industry, Giridih .… Petitioner Versus Allahabad Bank and another .... Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :
--------- 02/Dated: 6th October, 2012
(D.N. Patel, J.)
Ajay
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of due to the availability of an efficacious alternative remedy specifically an appeal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Varun Steel Industry, Giridih
Allahabad Bank
D.N. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
