Petitioner challenged an order taking cognizance under IPC 406 and 420; court dismissed the application without finding illegality.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi
Cr.M.P.No.415 of 2011
Sanjay Agarwal @ Sanjay Kumar Agarwal...Petitioner
V E R S U S
State of Jharkhand .and another.............Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr.P. Lala For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 :Mr.S.K.Sinha
8/ 3.9.12. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the complainant, I do not find any illegality with the order dated 5.4.2010 under which cognizance of the offence has been taken under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
Notwithstanding the fact that this application got dismissed, the petitioner would be at liberty to take all the pleas which have been taken in this application at an appropriate stage, i.e. at the time of discharge.
ND/
Sanjay Agarwal @ Sanjay Kumar Agarwal
State of Jharkhand .and another
MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
