The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a criminal petition for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two previous dates and the instant date.
Instant petition shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 14 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
[Through Virtual Mode]
CrlM No. 363/2025 in CRM (M) No. 165/2025
Abdul Rashid Dar
… Petitioner(s)
Through: - None.
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and Anr.
… Respondent(s)
Through: - None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE. (ORDER)
19.11.2025
There is no representation on behalf of the Petitioner. So was the case on two previous dates of hearing as well viz. 6th of May, 2025 and 23rd of July, 2025. It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this Petition any further. Accordingly, the instant Petition shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution, along with pending application(s), if any.
Interim direction(s), if any subsisting as on date, shall stand
vacated.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
19th November, 2025 “TAHIR”
Tahir Manzoor Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
Abdul Rashid Dar
Union Territory of J&K and Anr.
M. A. CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
