The High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had been dismissed for non-prosecution and the interim directions vacated. The petition challenged orders of the Special Mobile Magistrate and the Additional District Judge arising from the suit, which no longer exists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 52
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM(M) No. 232/2014
Sumit Mishra
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Qayoom Choudhary, Advocate vice Mr. Ajaz Chowdhary, Advocate
v/s
Lakshmi Narayan Mishra and another
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. R.K. Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohit Jain, Advocate for R-1
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 18.09.2026
2
CM(M) No. 232/2014
of prosecution, the interim direction has also been vacated. The
documents are taken on record.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 18.09.2026 Rahul Sharma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition under Article 227 challenging interim orders in a civil suit survives after the suit has been dismissed for non-prosecution?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sumit Mishra
Lakshmi Narayan Mishra
Sudarshan Kumar Mishra
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
