Petition challenged a preventive detention order under the PSA. Respondents stated the detention order had been executed and its maximum two-year period expired, so the petition was rendered infructuous and disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 13 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(Crl) No. 192/2023
Tajamul Ahmad Dar
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
UT of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Maha Majeed, Assistant Counsel vice Mr. Mohsin S. Qadiri, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
O R D E R
20.11.2025
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
20.11.2025 Manzoor
Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 25.11.2025 13.50
Tajamul Ahmad Dar
UT of J&K
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
