The petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition on the ground that the grievance had been redressed by the respondents. The court recorded the counsel's statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, vacating any interim directions.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 70 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 569/2022
M/s Infa Tech Computer Institute
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Suwaiba, Adv.
Vs.
UT of J&K and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Furqan Yaqoob, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
O R D E R 18.10.2024
On mention, this matter is taken out of turn.
Ms. Suwaiba, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of instant writ petition on the ground that the grievance of petitioner has been redressed by the respondents. Her statement is taken on record.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
18.10.2024 Manzoor
Manzoor Ul Hassan Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Srinagar 22.10.2024 09:51
M/s Infa Tech Computer Institute
UT of J&K and Ors.
SINDHU SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
