High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution after repeated non-appearances by the petitioners without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 12
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:OWP No. 621/2018
Shakuntla Devi and Ors. …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K and Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (11.12.2023)
On the last three dates of hearing which are 10.08.2022, 30.08.2022 & 31.03.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. These four non-appearances on behalf of the petitioners manifest that the petitioners are least interested in pursuing the present writ petition to its desired purpose.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stands vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
JAMMU
11.12.2023 Bunty
Shakuntla Devi and Ors.
State of J&K and Ors.
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
