The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner died and no legal representatives had sought revival of the writ petition or put in a claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 02
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:OWP No. 200/2013 IA No. 233/2013
Wazir Kedar Nath
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Pranav Kohli, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arun Dev Singh, Advocate.
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (08.12.2023)
Mr. Pranav Kohli, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Arun Dev Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have come to learn the fact that the petitioner has demised and till date no more of the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner have not approached them.
In light of this, the writ petition is rendered infructuous. The legal representatives if any of the deceased petitioner are at liberty to seek revival of this writ petition or may put up their claim by reference to the deceasedpetitioner before the authorities concerned for consideration of the matter for which the petitioner came forward with the present writ petition if the cause survives.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous along with connected application.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
JAMMU 08.12.2023 Shivalee
Wazir Kedar Nath
State of J&K
RAHUL BHARTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
