Appellant insurance company acceded to respondent's proposal to settle the claim. Court directed release of remaining amount and interest deposited with the Registry.
Claim settled; remaining amount and interest deposited with Registry released in favour of appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 66
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MA No. 443/2011 IA No. 144/2012
ICICI Lombard, General Insurance Co. Ltd.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R. S. Durswal, Advocate.
Vs
Meenu Vaid and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Arjun Bhatia, Advocate Respondent No. 1 present in person.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
5. Disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
03.08.2023 Sahil Padha
Jammu
ICICI Lombard, General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Meenu Vaid
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
