The Insurance Company settled the claims of the respondents by releasing the balance amount along with interest deposited by the respondents with the registry in favour of the Insurance Company.
Remaining amount of claim along with interest deposited by respondents with the Registry released in favour of the Insurance Company.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 66
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MA No. 442/2011 IA No. 146/2012
ICICI Lombard, General Insurance Co. Ltd.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R. S. Durswal, Advocate.
Vs
Vinod Gupta and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. R. K. Bhatia, Advocate Respondent No. 1 present in person.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
MA No. 442/2011 IA No. 146/2012
2
6. Disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
Jammu 03.08.2023 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the claim of respondent Nos. 1 to 3 can be settled with interest by releasing the deposited amount in favour of the Insurance Company?
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Vinod Gupta
Rajnes Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
