The High Court dismissed the petition/appeal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and apparent loss of interest by the petitioner, vacating any interim direction.
Petition/appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 60
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 92/2022
Devi Ditta
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None
V/s
UT of J&K & Ors
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Adrash Bhagat, GA
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 20.02.2023
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, so was the
case on the last several dates, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest
in prosecuting the case.
Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA Chowdhary) Judge
Jammu: 20.02.2023 Javid Iqbal
Devi Ditta
UT of J&K & Ors
MA Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
