The High Court dismissed a petition for non-prosecution due to lack of representation by the petitioners over several dates, vacating any interim directions.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 48
.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 494/2021
Vijay Kumar & Anr ….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None
V/s
UT of J&K & Anr
….Respondent(s)
Through :- None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 20.02.2023
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, so was the case on
the last several dates, which suggests that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the case.
Petition is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA Chowdhary) Judge
Jammu: 20.02.2023 Javid Iqbal
Vijay Kumar & Anr
UT of J&K & Anr
Ma Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
