The appellant opted to withdraw the appeal as it had become infructuous. The High Court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 17 Regular Cause List
THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
Trp(C) No. 01/2022
Mst. Mehbooba
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms. Shabnum, Adv. vice Mr. Sheikh Manzoor, Adv.
Vs.
Shakeel Ahmad Haji and another
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
05.11.2022
Ms. Shabnum, Adv. appearing vice Mr. Sheikh Manzoor, arguing counsel for the petitioner, submits that she has instructions from her client to withdraw this petition, as it has become infructuous. Her statement is taken on record.
Trp(c)No. 01/2022 is dismissed as withdrawn.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 05.11.2022 “ Imtiyaz”
IMTIYAZ UL GANI 2022.11.05 14:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mst. Mehbooba
Shakeel Ahmad Haji
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
