The High Court dismissed the originating writ petition for non-prosecution after observing that the petitioners had failed to appear in court for four consecutive hears and the current hearing despite having no appearance.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 38
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 655/2017 IA No. 01/2017
Ajay Kumar and another
….Petitioner(s)
Through:None.
V/s
State of J&K and another
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Nazia Fazal, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
23.12.2022
Status report has already been filed.
None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the previous four
consecutive dates of hearing. Same is the position today also. It seems that petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Javed Iqbal Wani)
Judge
Jammu: 23.12.2022 Meenakshi
Ajay Kumar and another
State of J&K and another
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
