In a writ petition, the petitioner failed to appear for consecutive hearings. The court dismissed the petition as non-prosecuted and vacated interim directions.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.53
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 2031/2017 IA No. 01/2017
Kuljeet Kour …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K and Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER
20.12.2022
None has appeared for the petitioner on two previous consecutive
hearings and none appears today as well.
Continuous non-appearance of the petitioner shows that the petitioner is
not interested in prosecuting the petition.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution
Interim direction, if any, shall stands vacated.
(Javed Iqbal Wani) Judge
Jammu
20.12.2022 Bunty
Kuljeet Kour
State of J&K
Javed Iqbal Wani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
