The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir disposed of LPA No.79/2022 on an application of parties. Ordered the Single Judge to expeditiously decide WP(C) No.2391/2021 and notified Dy. AG to file reply while keeping interim directions alive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 41
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
LPA No.79/2022 CM Nos.4876/2022 & 5597/2022 in
WP(C) No.2391/2021 CM No.8354/2021
Rajesh Sharma
….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Gagan Basotra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Mandeep Kour, Advocate
V/s UT of J and K and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gagan Kohli, Advocate Mr. K.D.S. Kotwal, Dy. AG
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE REJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 12.12.2022
LPA No.79/2022
Learned counsel for the parties submits that they will be satisfied in case the LPA in hand is disposed of provided the learned Single Judge is directed to consider and decide the writ petition, expeditiously.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties this appeal is disposed of with a request to the learned Single Judge to consider and decide the writ petition being WP(C) No. 2391/2021 at the earliest possible.
WP(C) No. 2391/2021
List on 23.12.2022, higher up, amongst first 10 cases.
Meanwhile, Mr. K.D.S. Kotwal, learned Dy. AG shall file reply to the
writ petition before the writ Court.
The interim direction dated 24.08.2022 shall continue till next date of hearing before the writ Court.
(Rajesh Sekhri) (Tashi Rabstan) Judge Chief Justice (Acting)
Jammu: PAWAN ANGOTRA2022.12.13 16:0412.12.2022 I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this documentPawan Angotra
Rajesh Sharma
UT of J and K
Rejesh Sekhri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
