The J&K High Court dismissed the original Writ Petition in default of appearance due to the petitioner's non-prosecution and absence on all hearing dates.
Petition dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 11
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No.465/2012
P.S Malhotra
….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Building Operations Controlling Authroity and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Rajnesh Raina, Advocate.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE REJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER
08.12.2022
There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner on last
three consecutive dates of hearing. Today is also the same position. It seems that
the petitioner is not interested in prosecution of the petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed in default of appearance and
for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri) (Tashi Rabstan) Judge Chief Justice (Acting)
Jammu:
08.12.2022 Surinder
Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No
SURINDER KUMAR 2022.12.08 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
P.S Malhotra
Building Operations Controlling Authority
Rejesh Sekhri
Tashi Rabstan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
