Dismissed
Nawal Khanna v. State Th.Sho.P/S.Nowabad and Ors.
J&K HCCRMC/354/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as petitioner expired during pendency.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.10
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
CRMC No. 354 of 2016 (Through Video Conferencing)
Nawal Khanna
...Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. M. A. Bhat, Adv. v/s
State of J&K and ors.
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG for R-1.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that the
petitioner has expired during the pendency of the present petition. His statement
is taken on record.
In view of the above, the present petition has been rendered
infructuous and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE
JAMMU 04.02.2022 Paramjeet
Nawal Khanna
State of J&K
SANJAY DHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court