The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the appeal against the respondent industries as it was identical to and covered by a prior decision of the same court dated 23rd May 2022 regarding CEA No. 10 of 2020.
Appeal dismissed on the same terms as CEA No. 10 of 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 14
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CEA No. 404/2022 CM No. 7412/2022 CM No. 7413/2022
Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J and K Jammu
….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Jagpaul Singh, Advocate
V/s
M/S R B Jodhamal Industries Pvt. Ltd. Tope Sherkhania Jammu J and K
….Respondent(s)
Through :-
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE REJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER
19.12.2022
(Rajesh Sekhri) (Tashi Rabstan) Judge Chief Justice (Acting)
Jammu: 19.12.2022
Pawan Angotra
PAWAN ANGOTRA 2022.12.20 13:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present appeal stands decided on the same grounds as settled law in CEA No. 10 of 2020.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K vs. OthersFollowed¶1
CEA No. 10 of 2020
Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise J&K
M/S R B Jodhamal Industries Pvt. Ltd.
Reji Sekhri
Tashi Rabstan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
