The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for three consecutive dates, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case. Any interim directions granted previously are vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 26
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
PIL No. 31/2016 IA No. 1/2016
Sheikh Sajjad Hussain ….Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
State of J and K and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Amit Gupta, AAG. HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING) Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER
None has appeared for the petitioner on the last three consecutive
dates of hearing and same is the position even today which shows that the petitoner is not interested in prosecuting the case, therefore, the instant appeal is
dismissed for non- prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri) (Tashi Rabstan) Judge Chief Justice (Acting)
Jammu: 15.12.2022 Renu
RENU BALA 2022.12.16 12:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
SHEIKH SAJJAD HUSSAIN
STATE OF J AND K AND OTHERS
RAJESH SEKHRI
TASHI RABSTAN
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
