The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by consent of parties after compromise outside the court. Interim directions were vacated.
Writ petition and connected CM(s) dismissed as withdrawn; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 141 Supplementary 1 Causelist
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 464/2021 CM No. 1443/2021
Tahira Begum.
.. …Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms Asma Rashid, Advocate. vs
Union Territory of JK & Ors.
.. …Respondent(s)
Through: Mr B.A. Dar, Sr AAG.
CORAM :
Hon’ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge.
ORDER
17.03.2021
Ms Asma Rashid, learned appearing counsel for the petitioner submits
that the parties have compromised outside the Court, as such, on instructions
she seeks withdrawal of the writ petition. Her statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement, the instant writ petition alongwith connected
CM(s) shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge SRINAGAR:
17.03.2021 “Hamid”
ABDUL HAMID BHAT 2021.03.22 10:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Tahira Begum
Union Territory of JK
Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
