In this matter, the petitioner filed a writ petition (WP (C) No. 1996/2019) against the Union of India. The petitioner's counsel filed a statement withdrawing the petition. The court allowed this withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition with no locution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 83 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) No. 1996/2019
National Institute of Computer Education
…Petitioner(s)
Through: Ms Sabeena Naveed, Adv.
Vs.
Union of India & Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr Tahir Majid Shamsi, ASGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 09.12.2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this petition and the same may be dismissed as such.
Her statement is taken on record.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 09.12.2021
Altaf
MOHAMMAD ALTAF NIMA 2021.12.09 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
National Institute of Computer Education
Union of India & Ors.
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
