Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's failure to appear on consecutive hearing dates, resulting in loss of interest in prosecuting the case.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.No 18 After Notice Matters
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SWP 162/2018, IA (1/2018)
Manzoor Ahmad Reshi
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None
V/s
State of JK & Ors.
…Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE. ORDER
08.12.2021
On the last two consecutive dates of hearings, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner. Today also when the case was called out, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioner, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the case. The same is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR
08.12.2021
Amir
Manzoor Ahmad Reshi
State of JK & Ors.
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
