Petitioner filed writ petition seeking fair compensation for land acquired under relevant Acts depending on the Land Acquisition Act and 2013 Act. Petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to amend.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh after amendments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 166
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: WP (C) No. 1860 of 2021
Abdul Ghani
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Sh. S. M. Wajahat, Advocate.
V/s
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir
…. Respondent(s)
Through: Sh. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
marla in khasra no. 217 min (old) and new 1103 and 1104 situated at Mahakund, Tehsil Gool, District Ramban. It is alleged that the aforesaid land has been acquired in accordance with the provisions of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act and a draft award was made on 17.11.2020. It is further alleged that the aforesaid draft award has been accepted as the final award.
2
and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) (PANKAJ MITHAL) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 08.09.2021 Tilak
Abdul Ghani
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir
RAJNESH OSWAL
PANKAJ MITHAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
