90 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Sr. No. 90
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CJ Court
Case: WP(C) No. 1750 of 2020 WP(C) No. 1751 of 2020 WP(C) No. 330 of 2021 & connected matters
Kathua Metals Pvt. Ltd. Kathua
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Sh. Jatin Mahajan, Advocate. Sh. Sudhir Malhotra, Advocate
V/s
Union of India and others …. Respondent(s)
Through: Sh. Jag Paul Singh, CGSC
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
Support Scheme.
is granted a week’s time to file counter affidavit. Two weeks thereafter allowed to the petitioner to file rejoinder, if any.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) (PANKAJ MITHAL)
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Jammu 06.09.2021 Tilak
Kathua Metals Pvt. Ltd. Kathua
Union of India
Rajnish Oswal
Pankaj Mithal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
