The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution, noting that no representation was filed on behalf of the petitioners and they had lost interest in proceeding with the case. Any interim direction was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 134 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 1508/2021 CM No. 5099/2021
Sony Jan and Anr.
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: - None
V/s
UT th. SSP and Ors.
….. Respondent(s)
Through: - None
CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge
(ORDER)
16.08.2021
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, which
shows petitioners have lost interest to prosecute the petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any,
shall stand vacated.
(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge
SRINAGAR
16.08.2021
“Mohammad Yasin Dar”
MOHAMMAD YASIN DAR 2021.08.17 11:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sony Jan and Anr.
UT th. SSP and Ors.
Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
