The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no representation was filed on behalf of the petitioner, indicating a loss of interest to prosecute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 110 Before Notice List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 522/2021 CM No. 1601/2021
Wazir Shah
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: - None
V/s
UT of JK and Ors.
….. Respondent(s)
Through: - None
CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, Judge
(ORDER)
12.08.2021
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, which
shows petitioner has lost interest to prosecute the petition.
Dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any,
shall stand vacated.
(Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge
SRINAGAR
12.08.2021
“Mohammad Yasin Dar”
MOHAMMAD YASIN DAR 2021.08.12 16:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Wazir Shah
UT of JK and Ors.
Ali Mohammad Magrey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
