Mohd.Amin Bader and Anr. v. Mohan Lal and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution due to the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.34
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OW104 No.69/2016 IA No.1/2016
Mohd. Amin Bader and Another
..Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
v/s
Mohan Lal and Others
.....Respondent (s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 07.09.2021
There had been no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing. Today is also the same position. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default of appearance and for non-prosecution. Interim direction if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
Jammu:
07.09.2021
Surinder
Whether the order is reportable? Yes/No Whether the order is speaking? Yes/No
SURINDER KUMAR 2021.09.08 14:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Mohd. Amin Bader and Another
Mohan Lal and Others
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court